Interesting article.
I have a little nag, as such, about being labelled part of an "outcast" group, being Pagan myself, and being a friend of Role-Players, Pagans, Goths, Metal-Heads, etc. I understand why you used this term of 'outcast', but I don't strictly agree with it. Perhaps 'niche' would have been a more agreeable one, or some such.
Also, I class myself as always having been Pagan, in it's broadest use of the term. And I class myself as having always been Bi, just that I never realized this until later in life (although my parents always 'knew', even before I did, in that divine way parent always do). I have never seen the two as intrinsically entwined as your article appears to suggest.
I am just me, and always was, and shall always be so.
I appreciate that we are now living in a more accepting world than, say, a mere generation or two ago, and I consider myself and my generation greatly fortunate for such.
But as regards being Pagan and Bi as having to go hand in hand, is a bit off. Many of my pagan friends are happily and confirmedly straight, and a few gay/lesbian. In fact, I'm the ONLY Bi-identified pagan I personally know of. If anything, I was the quirky odd one out amongst the group. Much goes the same for many of the Goths, Grungers, Role Players, Metal-Heads, etc who I have made acquaintance with have all proved, in their own ways, although still open-minded and accepting, have predominated with Mono-sexuals (Straights or Gay/lesbians).
If only what your article seems to suggest was as true this side of the pond.
The only truly Bi people I've come across other than my self in actual life (i.e, out side of the Internet aether) are much like me, identifying themselves as individuals; happily befriending with anyone who's a decent person, regardless of their personal kinks or niches. Be they whatever faith or ideology or taste or fashion sense or whatever, has proved somewhat regardless of us wanting to know the person for who s/he are inside. The rest is but technicalities.
Bookmarks