only for your eyes: c or uc?

[rayosytruenos]

Hi everyone!

I guess that in America, you don't see many uncut dicks, so I picked some really nice dicks to ask you which ones you like, uncut or cut dicks?

All the best,

ray

[rayosytruenos]

Some more to choose from...

[rayosytruenos]

Well, and a bonus of some more uncut dicks...

[RebekaLee]

hmm...thats interesting. thanks for that...i had never seen an uncut penis before

[chuckt6]

Good Lord! Actually intimidating looking, somewhat. Checked a Colt Studio album and these guys didn't look anything like your sample pictures. Of course in the Army you couldn't help but get a full range of samples to compare with so it remains interesting in the variability among men. Check Betty Dodson's site for comparison.

[Mrs.F]

Ok, those are HUGE! Some small guys have large dicks..damn! Almost scary

My husband was uncut until 6 months ago. Now that I have had both, my preference is deffinately CUT! He likes it better too!
But not something I would recommend to have done in your 30's unless need be. Alot of pain!

[TouchableTina4]

Thanks for sharing the pics. Those men are huge!! But I perfer cut!!

[texasman6172003]

Hi Ray,Thank you for the photos. Those are very hot. Like Tina,i prefer to play with cut cocks to,but dont mind the un cut also. Thanks Tex..

[codybear3]

Awright Ray...Bust out with the site address to find these meat-rockets...

[trip1]

Cut or Uncut I like them both. I'd imagine an uncut guy with more skin means more feeling for him. As far as the pic's go I'd love to see them in action LOL

[Biboz49]

I prefer cut only.

[m.in.heels&hose]

Hello everyone
I have been "exposed" to both cut and uncut, and it really does not matter to me, but both have their advantages

but thats just my opinion
m.in.heels&hose

[SweetBlackAngel]

I suddenly have a craving for kielbasa....

[rayosytruenos]

lol. I didn't know what kielbasa was. I needed to make a search...

"kielbasa: Polish sausage... "
lmao

I also found this:

TENACIOUS D LYRICS

"Kielbasa"

[spoken]
[KG:] Dude, we gotta fuckin' write something new. C'mon.
[strums]
[JB:] I don't like that. So far ba--, off to a bad start.
[strums again]
[JB:] Better, closer, warmer.
[strums again]
[JB:] That's it. Okay.

[sung]
I love ya baby but all I can think about is
Kielbasa sausage, your butt cheeks is warm.
I check my dipstick, you need lubrication honey,
My kielbasa sausage has just got to perform.
Now get it on!

I see you walkin', but all I can think about is
Dianetics, your butt cheeks is warm.
I check my dipstick, you need lubrication honey,
My kielbasa sausage has just got to perform.
Now I've been set loose-ah,
I'm shooting my juice-ah,
Right in your caboose.
Now fuckin' get it on!
Now get it on.
Get it on!

Dianetics Jr. much better than Krishna,
Dianetics Jr. much better indeed,
And all you people here you're tremendous,
(Except the people in the middle),
And you're smokin' up a big-ass bowl of weed
With me, me and KG.
All right!
Oh yeah,
All right! Oh my God!
All the ladies in the house say yeah (yeah),
C'mon, you muthafucka say a prayer (prayer),
When ya fight, ya gotsta fight fair,
You muthafucka, ho, you muthafucka,
You know what time it is?
Tenacious D time, you muthafucka, go!
Fuck yeah!
Yeah, yeah!

[spoken]
Dude, that was TNT.

[rayosytruenos]

Ok, those are HUGE! Some small guys have large dicks..damn! Almost scary

My husband was uncut until 6 months ago. Now that I have had both, my preference is deffinately CUT! He likes it better too!
But not something I would recommend to have done in your 30's unless need be. Alot of pain!

Hi!

Your answer got me interested. I know that everyone is different, but I think you could help some of us to understand that preference.

Is it for both of you better a cut dick because the dickhead becomes less sensitive and can last longer than before (as I've been told)?

Is it for better sensations while a fellatio?

I think it would be great to have both of your points of view.

If you think I've passed the line for asking you these questions, I apologize and simply ignore this post. I don't want to make anyone uncomfortable, just I'm very curious...

I again apologize if with this post I have made you uncomfortable.

Take care and all the best,

ray

[rayosytruenos]

Hello everyone
I have been "exposed" to both cut and uncut, and it really does not matter to me, but both have their advantages

but thats just my opinion
m.in.heels&hose

Hi!

Again, and as I said in my previous post, having you been "exposed" to both cut and uncut dicks, could you explain from your point of view, which are the advantages and disadvantages of both?

Once again, I want to apologize if with this, I make you uncomfortable. If that's the case, please forgive me and just ignore this post.

All the best and take care,

ray

[Flounder1967]

HI I'm Mrs F's husband,

I would like to say no you didn't go to far in asking the question I will dicuss it with anyone whom would is intrested in knowning.

The biggest reason I got clipped. Was due to the fact I couldn't finish, or had problems finishing. It was very frustrating. It took 6 weeks before i was cleared to have fun and than it took another 2-3 weeks before i comfortable with doing evverything. But since i've been cut it has been a blast. I feels better I can finish easiler and a faster.

SInce the cutting we both beilve that mr winky has growing wider and maybe a little longer. It has been very satisfaying. I did have pics of it just before and after, but since have gotton rid of then.

[FSJeepguy]

Cut? Uncut?
Hell I like cocks so both are fine with me.
If I had a chice I'd go for cut, but it doesn't disqualify a guy if he's uncut.

[Eddie altamonte]

Mhmmm i love em both...I feel its more fun to play and stroke an uncut cock, being uncut myseld i am prejuidice to say that that little touch of foreskin gives great pleasure and i myself have no problem in lasting a long, long time

[Apleasureseeker]

Excellent pix by the way. Got my joint jumpin'

[rayosytruenos]

By the way, I just wanted to explain that in this thread, if you pass the pointer over the pics, it gives you the solution of the enigma (that is to say, if that dick is cut or uncut).

I mean:

ucd1.jpeg= uncut dick
cd1.jpeg= cut dick

Just in case...

All the best,

ray

[phat_vampyre]

I personally prefer INTACT PEOPLE to CUT PEOPLE. I exclude from this rationale personal choices made by adult individuals for themselves. I would also like to stop a misconception before it starts: I am not opposed to Judiasm or any other faith or religion, I support full religious equality for all individuals. There are many Jews and Muslims, for example, who are speaking out against ritual genital cutting, and I support such brave people whole heartedly in their efforts to make their religions more humane and compassionate.

I find this particular thread a little disturbing. As a human rights activist, I find the whole issue of preference in whether or not a penis has been genitally mutilated to be a cruel topic, and would like to, as a bisexual, include all genders in my view of preference. In our society we do not consider the rights of the individual at infancy, and boys and the intersexed are often deprived of a freedom of self determination. The intersexed specifically, often face full sexual dysfunction or even sterilization. Other societies and cultures include women in their rush to cut. Most American males had no say in their current status of 'cut or uncut' and it disturbs me that anybody would have a preference between a cut or intact penises, or would prefer somebody else remove a part of their body as a means of sexual or social acceptence, regardless of the reasoning. It disturbs me most that we consider this an aesthetic issue, when the canvas we are working on is an infant, strapped to a board, with no say in what is being done to their bodies.

Thousands of specialized nerve endings and up to twenty square inches of erogenous tissues are lost when an infant undergoes circumcision, and the intersexed, as I said, fair much worse.

Fortunately for men, there are nonsurgical techniques that will restore some function to the penis, and much of the appearence. "CAT II Q" is one awesome product that I have recently started using, and there are other methods as well, usually involving o-rings, tape, straps and weights. Nonsurgical techniques may not work so well for women, and at this time there is little hope for the intersexed once the cutting is done, as they are very often butchered at birth with no considerationg for their own psychological and physiological identity. Their ambiguous genitalia is feminized even if their wiring is predominately male.

So to clarify, I prefer a person to be in a condition they chose. I prefer other people not to try to pressure people into doing things to themselves or others that are irreversible and damaging, and accept them as they are. I prefer male and female genitals as nature intended them, and the intersexed to have a choice in determining their physical sense of identity, even if that means leaving their bodies well enough alone. I would prefer that doctors stop profiting from the unnecessary injury of others, especially infants, regardless of gender, and regardless of their cultural backgrounds.

I will apologize at this time to anybody who might interpret this as a rant or a flame, but I won't apologize for my words.

[rayosytruenos]

I personally prefer INTACT PEOPLE to CUT PEOPLE. [...] There are many Jews and Muslims, for example, who are speaking out against ritual genital cutting, and I support such brave people whole heartedly in their efforts to make their religions more humane and compassionate.

I thought I needed to answer your post, because I agree with a lot of the things you have said. I'll go bit by bit.

First, I want to start by saying that I'm Spanish, and most of Spaniards are uncut, or as you like to say, intact. The people that undergo the procedure of circumcision are the ones that they require it for medical reasons, and the ones that now (due to the freedom of religion that has been installed since 30 years ago) wish to do it due to their religious beliefs.

I never thought about it like a big issue as it seems to be in the USA to be cut or uncut. We always thought about being uncut as normal, and there were always some friends or relatives that had some very tight foreskins that prevented or made quite painful an erection. So still we saw it as normal, that they had to cut it in order to be able to perform sexually as everyone else. The ones that underwent the procedure didn't think of it as a mutilation, neither their friends with uncut dicks.

I noticed the fascination some Americans have with the fact/existence of foreskin in most of European guys, when I met some Americans and they were obsessed with the issue of foreskin, some liking it as something wonderful while others disgusted with what they thought it made a dick dirty and horrendous (for having a bit more of skin down there...)

I didn't know that there were groups of Jews and Muslims fighting against that tradition, as all the ones I've met they see it as a requisite to be part of those religious groups. Actually one of those religious groups is famous for having gone throughout South America, cutting foreskins converting a lot of people to their religion.

I find this particular thread a little disturbing. As a human rights activist, I find the whole issue of preference in whether or not a penis has been genitally mutilated to be a cruel topic, and would like to, as a bisexual, include all genders in my view of preference. In our society we do not consider the rights of the individual at infancy, and boys and the intersexed are often deprived of a freedom of self determination. The intersexed specifically, often face full sexual dysfunction or even sterilization. Other societies and cultures include women in their rush to cut.

Here I differ a little from your point of view, as I think the 3 circumcisions cannot be gathered and put them together as a whole.

The feminine circumsicion is horrendous, and I was really shocked when a woman from one African country, educated in France, who studied at the University of The Sorbonne in Paris, and got a Doctorate in her speciality, proclaimed that the feminine circumcision was necessary, that she was circumcised and that she wanted her daughters to be circumcised too.

I want to explain for those who are not aware of what the feminine circumcision is about. There are different methods of feminine circumcision, but the method most used is the one that requires the ablation of the clitoris and usually also the sewing of the labia leaving just a very small orifice. In other words, they cut the clitoris, depriving that woman from the pleasure it could have given to her, plus they sew the labia, what makes sexual relationships really painful and not wanted by most of women that have undergone that procedure. (It is seen as a way of preventing them to have extra-marital affairs and sometimes it's done or re-done when their husbands go abroad or away for some time) Can you imagine any woman wishing to have sex, knowing that they are going to suffer unbearable pain?

The intersexed are those people, usually dealt with when they are just babies, whose genitals are not clear enough to know whether they are boys or girls. So instead of checking the genetic sex and see what syndrome the baby suffers from (usually they have some anomalies in the chromosomes that determine their sex, one of the most famous is the Klinefelter syndrome), and then with reconstructive surgery trying to fix the external genitalia with the genetic code, they usually deal with them in a very easy way (without thinking about the consequences produced to those unfortunate babies). If there is a penis not clearly defined, they just cut it (if the girl have a hyperdeveloped clitoris, they usually leave it and treat the baby as a boy, but things are changing for the better) and what it should have been a boy, it's now with the magic of a scalpel, a girl, while still most of her (!!!) body hormones are gone to make him feel like a boy.

So of course, I also think that the way of treating the intersexed is horrendous, but fortunately, it seems that this situation is improving a lot, in the way that it's not that widely used anymore.

In the case of masculine circumcision, I also would like to leave the people decide for themselves when they are grown-ups, but as it is a case mostly related with traditional religious beliefs, I wouldn't comment much further about it. They say that as a baby, it doesn't hurt... well, I don't think so, it's just that the babies are not big enough to punch you senseless after you have cut their bits.

In some religions the circumcision is traditionally done while the boy is about 4-7 years old, and the relatives make a big issue of it, dressing the boy with rich clothes, and taking him in procession on a donkey or horse to the place of the ceremony, usually a barber shop, where the barber cuts the baby's bits without any anaesthetics. By the way, this is usually accompanied by a groups of drummers and everyone is shouting cheers of joy (I think the real reason is not to let hear the screams of the poor boy).

Most American males had no say in their current status of 'cut or uncut' and it disturbs me that anybody would have a preference between a cut or intact penises, or would prefer somebody else remove a part of their body as a means of sexual or social acceptence, regardless of the reasoning. It disturbs me most that we consider this an aesthetic issue, when the canvas we are working on is an infant, strapped to a board, with no say in what is being done to their bodies.

Thousands of specialized nerve endings and up to twenty square inches of erogenous tissues are lost when an infant undergoes circumcision, and the intersexed, as I said, fair much worse.

I repeat that I wish they could choose by themselves when they grow up.

I don't think I consider this an aesthetic issue. I consider an aesthetic issue to be shaved, trimmed or have the full bush with your dick/fanny.

The reason for my posting of the uncut/cut dicks was to show some really nice dicks and try to know why is such an issue to Americans to be cut or not. I posted many uncut dicks and as you can check by the answers, there are people that hadn't seen before (even on the internet) an uncut dick!!! which makes me think that in the USA the masculine circumcision must be something almost compulsory...

I know about the problems that can happen with circumcision... Sometimes the tissues don't heal properly or they get attached to places where they shouldn't, like to the glans, sometimes over the rim, sometimes bending the penis to an awkward position when that happens and later that person grows up and has an erection...

Nevertheless I didn't make my question on babies (or kids for that matter), because I'm not interested in that, but in grown-ups who voluntarily or not have or have not cut their foreskins. I focused on something that is already done, and accepted like inevitable by these adults.

I know that thousands of specialized nerve endings are lost when an infant undergoes circumcision but I don't think that the amount of lost tissues reaches twenty square inches.

Fortunately for men, there are nonsurgical techniques that will restore some function to the penis, and much of the appearence. "CAT II Q" is one awesome product that I have recently started using, and there are other methods as well, usually involving o-rings, tape, straps and weights. Nonsurgical techniques may not work so well for women, and at this time there is little hope for the intersexed once the cutting is done, as they are very often butchered at birth with no considerationg for their own psychological and physiological identity. Their ambiguous genitalia is feminized even if their wiring is predominately male.

Yes, fortunately they are methods to regain/restore the foreskin with different rates of success. I didn't know about the "CAT II Q".

So to clarify, I prefer a person to be in a condition they chose. I prefer other people not to try to pressure people into doing things to themselves or others that are irreversible and damaging, and accept them as they are. I prefer male and female genitals as nature intended them, and the intersexed to have a choice in determining their physical sense of identity, even if that means leaving their bodies well enough alone. I would prefer that doctors stop profiting from the unnecessary injury of others, especially infants, regardless of gender, and regardless of their cultural backgrounds.

I will apologize at this time to anybody who might interpret this as a rant or a flame, but I won't apologize for my words.

I did not/ do not/ am not going to pressure people into doing things like circumcision. I'm uncut and I have always wondered why somebody without a religious background/tradition would do it to themselves or their offspring.

Well, I just wanted to clarify my point of view, just as it seems it was interpreted in a different way other than my intention.

All the best,

ray

[nubiwoman]

Wow!

if ever a thread opened up a whole new perspective to ponder..this one certainly did

as a european woman i understand very little about the politics of male circumcism beyond the religious ritual (which has always disturbed me) and necessary health reasons due to a too tight foreskin..

Certainly religious reasons are shrouded in mystery and mothers of Jewish babies seem to be deeply traumatised but somehow intimitidated into putting their male babies through this ordeal..

When i first saw Rays thread i smiled and passed it off as one mainly for the boys.. just a bit of mischevious fun on a very open minded website which has a healthy interest in such matters

then i read phat vampires response.....

you seem to speak from the heart phat vampire and i am truly grateful to learn from your your insights... and ray responds with equal eloquence... i salute you both and again raise a wry smile at the diversity this site continues to deliver...

thank you ....julie

[lastlaf44]

I don't really have what you'd call a preference for either, really. I'm in Canada and my boyfriend is uncut. Circumcision (sp?) is relatively common in North America. I heard it started with non-religious parents as a hygeine thing...which is simply foolishness. All you need is basic hygeine, we don't need to go lopping off bits of ourselves for that. Today, I think it's just done out of habit. No one really stops to think about it, they just do it b/c it's been done for so long and is commonplace now. There's really no consideration for why it started (religious ritual) and if it even applies to them. If I ever have a little boy one day, I won't have him circumsised.

~LastLaf~

[bigregory]

I like them cut.Im cut
as are my 2 sons.
No god was not a factor in cutting my boys.
I have no idea why we chose to do it,
it was just the norm.
I have no regrets about it.

[Bi-ten]

Thanks Ray,

Loved the pics, thank you. I have to agree with Phat Vampire, I find the practice of surgical removal of the foreskin to be disturbing since the 'victim' of the procedure has no choice.

I also find the blind acceptance of the procedure in north america to be equally disturbing since there does not appear to be any really good reason to perform it.

I have heard many justifications including hygene, religion, cosmetic appearance...all of which do not seem to outwiegh the most critical question 'should a person have the right to say what happens to his/her own body?'.

My answer has to be unequivocal..yes, yes...and yes. As an adult you have the right (for now) to refuse surgical procedures that others feel are in your best interest...and surely no one is going to lop off bits of your body just because they find them unsightly!

So if you are a new parent, please take the time to consider your actions and inform yourself of the pros and cons of any invasive action upon your child.

Peace.

PS I am uncut and would not allow my son to be cut.

[Flounder1967]

O.K. Female circumcision is wrong no matter what.

I am now cut. I was uncut. I found that being cut is better. I did get my son cut, though i wasn't sure about it at first. but now i feel it was a good decision.

This next couple of lines go directly to PHAT. Are you passing judgment on me for getting myself cut. Since now I'm not hole. I hate people that preach and have nothing to truly say. I got myself for medical reasons. Is that not a good reason to get cut. I see you didn't ask me any question before you preached on what it right and wrong. I made the decision, and have made the right decision concerning my son.

[kerryj]

Back in my fun playdays, 95% of the cocks I played with were cut, the uncut ones were pretty rare. Because of that, uncut cocks were more of a turn on for me, just something a little different. As long as they were clean, they were fun to play with. Most were clean, however, I came across a couple of unclean uncut gentleman who were just plain nasty. Why would anyone go into an adult bookstore looking to play, sporting a cock that smelled like rotten cheese? Yuk! Talk about a turn off. Man, I ain't putting that thing in my mouth. Then they wouldn't take no for an answer and kept sticking it back thru the hole every time I rejected it. I wanted to give that nasty old cheese smelling cock a good whack with my shoe or something, just to get rid of it. Of course, some of the uncut cocks were not that clean either, so I have a feeling it was more the owner of the cock and his preference for personal hygene, rather than the skin on the end of the cock that determined it's playability. Anyway, I loved them all, and played with quite a few of them-cut or uncut.

Ray, your photos are just awesome. Aren't those juicy big ones just so much fun to look at?

[codybear3]

Hey ray...How about this uncut lad?